Dragon 200E Lower Case Daughterboard ROM question

For the discussion of all hardware related topics.
dublevay
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 3:41 pm

Re: Dragon 200E Lower Case Daughterboard ROM question

Post by dublevay »

OK - I am working on something. :)
dublevay
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 3:41 pm

Re: Dragon 200E Lower Case Daughterboard ROM question

Post by dublevay »

A possible new version of the lower case board. Minimised probably as much as I can - now down to 50.08 x 55.37mm.
Candidate1.png
Candidate1.png (940.08 KiB) Viewed 335967 times
dublevay
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 3:41 pm

Re: Dragon 200E Lower Case Daughterboard ROM question

Post by dublevay »

Candidate 2. 58.34mm x 38.74mm.
Candidate2.png
Candidate2.png (538.33 KiB) Viewed 335956 times
If I go ahead with these, they will be pre-assembled - apart from any headers and the DIP socket.
User avatar
robcfg
Posts: 1658
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Dragon 200E Lower Case Daughterboard ROM question

Post by robcfg »

Looks really nice!
dublevay
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 3:41 pm

Re: Dragon 200E Lower Case Daughterboard ROM question

Post by dublevay »

I went further, and SMD'd nearly everything! :D
Candidate3.jpg
Candidate3.jpg (177.28 KiB) Viewed 335939 times
User avatar
robcfg
Posts: 1658
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Dragon 200E Lower Case Daughterboard ROM question

Post by robcfg »

I've been wondering if there's a way to select the banks and the inverted colour using one of the unused I/O addresses instead of doing it with switches and jumpers.
dublevay
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 3:41 pm

Re: Dragon 200E Lower Case Daughterboard ROM question

Post by dublevay »

I got the new boards back from James a few days ago, and fitted the remaining components. Sadly they didn't work at first, but it was seemingly the missing /MS to /FS signal. Connecting that back on, and we are in business in this D64. The lower case board is sitting in the 6847 socket, with a SuperRGB board plugged into the lower case board.
20251027_202743.jpg
20251027_202743.jpg (467.6 KiB) Viewed 1029 times
20251027_202753.jpg
20251027_202753.jpg (389.56 KiB) Viewed 1029 times
20251027_203611.jpg
20251027_203611.jpg (476.68 KiB) Viewed 1029 times
dublevay
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 3:41 pm

Re: Dragon 200E Lower Case Daughterboard ROM question

Post by dublevay »

When I redo the boards, I will likely just add another jumper to either open or close the pin 12 to 37 bridge.
sixxie
Posts: 1439
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 8:36 am
Location: Hertfordshire
Contact:

Re: Dragon 200E Lower Case Daughterboard ROM question

Post by sixxie »

That's a very odd result: when I measure continuity on an original Dragon 64, those two pins are definitely connected on the motherboard. So long as your carrier is connecting both through directly I can't see why your bodge wire would be needed.

But at this point I'd just be arguing against reality!
dublevay
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 3:41 pm

Re: Dragon 200E Lower Case Daughterboard ROM question

Post by dublevay »

Thinking about it, it doesn't really make sense, as the SuperRGB board is working alone without the link on it! I need to investigate more. Ah, mind you, SuperRGB is probably doing it's own stuff with FS.
Post Reply