XRoar Windows packaging - good? bad?

A place to discuss everything Dragon related that doesn't fall into the other categories.
Post Reply
sixxie
Posts: 1150
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 8:36 am
Location: Hertfordshire
Contact:

XRoar Windows packaging - good? bad?

Post by sixxie »

I've pushed out some new snapshot builds here:

http://www.6809.org.uk/tmp/xroar/

Firstly, this hopefully includes all the option parsing changes I wanted to get done - in the config file you can "quote sections" and Include\ Escape\x20Sequences. From the command line it assumes your shell has done all the quoting but still permits escape sequences (so you can still '-type' things with \r, etc.).

I'm also told the snapshot builds of late have been a bit better for avoiding the slowdown on Windows.

But you'll also see some .msi files in there (just in time for "winget" to come and replace it, I suppose). Is this a packaging format people like? It installs the binary to a system location and plonks down startup menu and desktop links. Only downside is you can't just stick your ROMs in the unpacked directory, you actually have to create "%USERPROFILE%/Local Settings/Application Data/XRoar/roms".

I'm thinking of having the binary create that directory when you run it - maybe even create an empty xroar.conf in the level above so people have something to edit.

The MSIs are configured such that you can have a release build and a snapshot build installed simultaneously, and a new installer will overwrite the old version of whichever build type. Also the snapshot versioning has changed due the great way MS ignore their own version strings in their packager :)

Any thoughts?

Edit: I've just found out that Windows moved its settings directories again... Now there's something called "AppData". Argh!
sorchard
Posts: 435
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 9:43 pm
Location: Norwich UK

Re: XRoar Windows packaging - good? bad?

Post by sorchard »

I tried the msi on my work laptop which has Win7. The desktop shortcut works, as does the link to the manual via the start menu. The installation ended up here:

C:\Program Files\6809.org.uk\XRoar snapshot 0.35.15208

I was able to put roms in either of these folders:

C:\Users\Stew\AppData\Local\XRoar\roms
C:\Users\Stew\AppData\Roaming\XRoar\roms

It is also possible to put roms in the installation folder with admin permission. xroar seems fine with that.

The AppData folder is hidden, and not easy to find unless you already know where it is. I think the average Windows user wouldn't even be aware of it. Windows users would be more familiar with the 'Documents' folder as it is not hidden and much easier to find. It looks like you get to this folder programmatically with "%USERPROFILE%\Documents"

Creating an empty/example folder/file structure would make it much easier for users to drag files to the right places. A shortcut to the folder is also handy.

Personally, I always put xroar on a short path from the root to make things easier on the command line. New versions just got dropped into the existing folder. That said my use case is more development oriented, so probably not representative of someone who mainly wants to run a collection of existing titles.
Stew
sixxie
Posts: 1150
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 8:36 am
Location: Hertfordshire
Contact:

Re: XRoar Windows packaging - good? bad?

Post by sixxie »

Thanks for testing that - I guess AppData existed even in Windows 7, then? I'm guessing that "Local Settings/Application Data/" and "Application Data/" have been maintained as symlinks I mean junctions.

But you're right about the hidden directories - I found it quite annoying, and I knew they were there! "Documents/XRoar/" is a good idea. I'll tweak things so it looks there first for the conf file and, as per the other paths, in "Documents/XRoar/roms/" for the ROM images.

So far everyone expressing an opinion has consistently preferred a simple ZIP file distribution. Takes me no extra effort to build both now (I already baked it into my build script along with all the GUID variations for snapshot builds), but I'll probably carry on primarily listing the ZIPs, and maybe have the MSIs sitting in the download directory for people to find if they want to.
Alastair
Posts: 626
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:33 pm

Re: XRoar Windows packaging - good? bad?

Post by Alastair »

I'm happy with the ZIP files, but I've been using XRoar from the very early days and so I am used to copying over the contents of the ZIP file, I suspect most other people using XRoar also fall in that category.

The question is what would someone who has never used XRoar before prefer?
Azerpy
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 1:16 pm

Re: XRoar Windows packaging - good? bad?

Post by Azerpy »

Hello Ciaran.
Thank you for this new version of Xroar.
I have installed it on my W10 laptop (64 bits) with the .msi file.
Perfect.
I can launch xroar in the start list of programs and see the new manual there.
I have put all my files in a Documents/XROAR folder as written in the manual 1.1.2.
Only one thing, if I put Xroar in full screen, no posibility to go back with the escape key.
It is not a problem for me, but in this case, I have to use the "windows" key and shut Xroar.
Gérard.
sixxie
Posts: 1150
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 8:36 am
Location: Hertfordshire
Contact:

Re: XRoar Windows packaging - good? bad?

Post by sixxie »

Azerpy wrote: Thu Jun 11, 2020 3:33 pm Only one thing, if I put Xroar in full screen, no posibility to go back with the escape key.
Try F11 or Control+F. Escape key doing that would get annoying quick, as it's mapped to BREAK :)
Azerpy
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 1:16 pm

Re: XRoar Windows packaging - good? bad?

Post by Azerpy »

To go and return from full screen, F11 and alt F are good !
Thanks.
Post Reply