Search found 1348 matches
- Sun Jun 26, 2011 11:22 am
- Forum: Dragon General
- Topic: XRoar 0.25 released
- Replies: 15
- Views: 7680
Re: XRoar 0.25 released
There are no real Windows improvements (unless you run the GTK+ build ;)) beyond the core stuff. You can define new machines & carts by specifying architecture, rom, etc. in the config file, there are extra CLI options, and accuracy has improved (there are certain documents online that my oscillosco...
- Wed Jun 22, 2011 2:09 pm
- Forum: Dragon General
- Topic: XRoar 0.25 released
- Replies: 15
- Views: 7680
Re: XRoar 0.25 released
"Bugger"robcfg wrote:I've messing around with the new version with the fancy UI, and I've found that even marking a drive as "write back", it doesn't save the disk image after pressing eject or closing the emulator.
The usual combination of CTRL+SHIFT+[5-8] works fine.
I'll look at it soonish.
- Tue Jun 21, 2011 7:42 am
- Forum: Dragon General
- Topic: XRoar 0.25 released
- Replies: 15
- Views: 7680
Re: XRoar 0.25 released
Wow, excellent! Well FYI the only thing I had to hack out of the code to build that was hiding the mouse pointer on a keypress - not the greatest loss :) Your success prompted me to look into why it looks so bad under Wine, and it turns out this is an old bug in Wine, and the packages in Debian are ...
- Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:12 pm
- Forum: Dragon General
- Topic: XRoar 0.25 released
- Replies: 15
- Views: 7680
Re: XRoar 0.25 released
Well, after fighting with GtkGLExt's autobreak for a while and then just hand-editing the files it generates so it doesn't think it can use X11, I've built something that seems to work under Wine, albeit in an interesting fashion: all the menus take about half the height of my whole display. Not opt...
- Mon Jun 20, 2011 1:42 pm
- Forum: Dragon General
- Topic: XRoar 0.25 released
- Replies: 15
- Views: 7680
Re: XRoar 0.25 released
Well technically , yes! But GTK+ is such a huge mass of dependencies, you either end up distributing enormous packages, or imposing extra steps on the end user (download & install GTK+ and GtkGLExt). Not such a big deal on Linux where it will probably be there anyway, and if it's not, it's just an "...
- Sun Jun 19, 2011 8:59 am
- Forum: Dragon General
- Topic: XRoar 0.25 released
- Replies: 15
- Views: 7680
XRoar 0.25 released
(Finally). The only thing immediately visibly new is the user interface under GTK+ and Mac OS X, but all the other fixes and odds and ends that have appeared in snapshots over the last nearly-a-year should be in there. Didn't get around to adding the tape/drive control dialogs to the Mac OS GUI I'm ...
- Wed Jun 08, 2011 8:14 am
- Forum: Dragon General
- Topic: xroar and disk writeback
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3034
Re: xroar and disk writeback
Bug: fixed! Thanks for that :) What I haven't fixed is that it's actually impossible to specify a disk bigger than 40TSS when creating... As for the UI, I've been working on a little something: http://www.6809.org.uk/tmp/xroar/gtk-tape-ui.png http://www.6809.org.uk/tmp/xroar/gtk-drive-ui.png GTK+ on...
- Tue Jun 07, 2011 10:03 am
- Forum: Dragon General
- Topic: WIMP on the Dragon
- Replies: 10
- Views: 5629
Re: WIMP on the Dragon
WIMP is by Michael Edwards ("Broomsoft"). I'm not aware of anything that runs in it other than what comes with it. There's also the "MAGIC GURU" system by Max Hantsch - there was a thread on the board about this a while back, but searching for "magic" doesn't seem to find it. Check it out here: http...
- Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:02 pm
- Forum: Dragon General
- Topic: 6809 CPU in Dragons.
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1931
Re: 6809 CPU in Dragons.
I have a CoCo 2 in which it is not socketed.
Edit: just opened up the CoCo 3, and it's not socketed in that either.
Edit: just opened up the CoCo 3, and it's not socketed in that either.
- Thu May 26, 2011 6:58 am
- Forum: Dragon General
- Topic: New CoCoDskUtil
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2969
Re: New CoCoDskUtil
I gave it a go under Wine. Installs ok, but running the exe just gives "Run-time error '0'". The screenshots make it look pretty useful though.
Edit: hexedit.exe runs ok, but I already have native hex editors
Edit: hexedit.exe runs ok, but I already have native hex editors